Azentri
Comparison

Verkada vs Cisco Meraki: which fits your sites

Meraki puts cameras in the network dashboard; Verkada runs the whole security stack. Cisco's 2025-26 end-of-sale wave is forcing the choice.

Jump to the comparisonGet a Verkada quote

Side by side

VerkadaCisco MerakiVerdict
Published pricingHardware list prices published per model ($799 CD22 to $2,099 CD63); license MSRPs published per term alongside them.Quote-only via partners; reseller-advertised street prices put an MV13 around $1,300 and a 1-year MV license around $330 list.Verkada
License modelPer-device Command license required, 1/3/5/10-year terms.Per-camera MV license required, 1 to 10-year terms; expiry triggers a 30-day grace period, then the organization shuts down (per-device licensing narrows this to the lapsed devices).Even: both need live licenses
What the license includesOne tier: all analytics, unlimited users, updates, 24/7 support, plus 30-day cloud backup.Dashboard and analytics, but cloud recording is a separate Cloud Archive license (7 to 365-day tiers, per camera).Verkada
AI & analyticsAI search of people and vehicles, safety alerts, heatmaps, and Helix ERP/MES video pairing, included on analytics-capable models.Motion search and people analytics in the dashboard; no ERP/MES video pairing.Verkada
RetentionUp to 365 days onboard, guaranteed per model.On-camera edge storage; Cisco's own tables show 19 to 28 days on an MV52 at 4K ; longer means buying Cloud Archive.Verkada
WarrantyUp to 10 years, model-dependent.3 to 5 years on published camera models.Verkada
Portfolio directionExpanding: cameras, access, alarms, sensors, intercom, guest.Contracting around cameras: MV Gen 2 end-of-sale Dec 2025, Systems Manager June 2026, and the entire MT sensor line end-of-sale Nov 2026 with no successor.Verkada
Security stack breadthCameras, access control, monitored alarms with published per-site tiers, environmental sensors, intercom, and visitor management.Cameras and (now end-of-sale) sensors; no access control or alarm products.Verkada
Network stack breadthNone. Security only; pairs with whatever network you run.The genuine Meraki advantage: MX security appliances, MS switches, MR access points and cameras in one dashboard, one licensing agreement.Meraki
Third-party camerasCommand Connector ingests existing ONVIF/RTSP fleets.No ONVIF ingest on any product; outbound RTSP is the only open video interface.Verkada
Free trial30 days, full platform, free two-way shipping.Free trial with shipped gear and prepaid return label (US/Canada).Even

Azentri is an authorized Verkada partner. Prices shown as of July 2026. Meraki retention varies enormously with resolution and motion settings; Cisco's tables run from 11 days (MV52, 4K, heavy motion) to 500+ days at 720p. Meraki Gen 3 camera warranty terms weren't published at the model level when we checked; the 3-to-5-year figures above are Cisco's published terms for earlier MV models.

The Cisco question: where is Meraki's physical-security line headed?

The comparison changed in 2025 and 2026. Cisco end-of-sale'd the MV Gen 2 cameras in December 2025, is ending Systems Manager sales in June 2026, and discontinued the entire MT environmental-sensor line effective November 2026, with no Cisco successor. The Gen 3 cameras continue, but the physical-security portfolio around them is contracting while Verkada's is expanding into access control, alarms, sensors, and intercom. If you're betting a multi-year security deployment on a platform, the direction of travel is data.

If your MV Gen 2 cameras or MT sensors are on that end-of-sale list, you're facing a hardware refresh either way, which makes this the moment to compare platforms. On licensing the two match: Meraki cameras stop recording after a lapsed license's 30-day grace period, and Verkada cameras also require a live license to keep operating. The differences that decide the comparison are the rows above: what the license includes, how long footage lives on the camera, and how much of the security stack one vendor covers.

Who should pick which

Verkada is the better fit if…

  • You need doors, alarms, sensors, or intercom from the same vendor as your cameras
  • You want long retention without stacking per-camera cloud-archive licenses
  • You have an existing third-party camera fleet to bring along (Command Connector)
  • The 2025-26 end-of-sale wave makes you want a vendor all-in on physical security

Cisco Meraki is the better fit if…

  • Your network is already Meraki (MX/MS/MR) and cameras should join that dashboard and co-term licensing
  • The buying center is IT, and video is one more device class, not a security program
  • You have modest per-site camera counts across distributed sites
  • You want Cisco partner discounts and an existing enterprise agreement to apply

Both are per-camera subscriptions; the separation is doors, alarms, and long retention, where Meraki either can't bid the line item or bids it as add-on licenses. Our Verkada pricing guide covers how that side is structured; a quote prices your site mix.

Verkada vs Cisco Meraki FAQ

Is Cisco discontinuing Meraki cameras?

Not the camera line itself. Gen 3 MV cameras (MV13/23/33/53/63/73/93) continue. But Cisco's published end-of-life table shows MV Gen 2 cameras end-of-sale December 31, 2025, Systems Manager end-of-sale June 3, 2026, and the entire MT sensor line end-of-sale November 10, 2026 with no successor. The cameras remain; the physical-security portfolio around them is shrinking.

What happens when a Meraki license expires?

Under co-termination licensing, the organization enters a 30-day grace period; if it isn't brought back into compliance, the dashboard and devices shut down until licensing is applied. Per-device licensing limits the shutdown to the lapsed devices. To be fair on both sides: Verkada cameras also require a live license to operate; both platforms are subscriptions.

Is Meraki cheaper than Verkada?

Rarely, once configured comparably. Reseller street prices put an MV13 around $1,300 with a required per-camera license around $330/yr list, and long retention adds Cloud Archive licenses per camera. Verkada publishes hardware from $799 and bundles analytics, support, and 30-day cloud backup into one license. Where Meraki saves money is when cameras ride an existing Meraki enterprise agreement.

Which has longer video retention?

Verkada, and it's not close at high resolution. Verkada models store up to 365 days onboard, guaranteed per model. Meraki's own retention tables show an MV52 at 4K holding 19 to 28 days (11 under heavy motion); longer retention means per-camera Cloud Archive licenses in 7 to 365-day tiers.

Can Meraki or Verkada use my existing cameras?

Verkada can: the Command Connector appliance ingests third-party ONVIF/RTSP cameras into Command. Meraki has no ONVIF ingest on any product (Cisco staff have stated it isn't planned), and outbound RTSP is the only open interface. An existing camera fleet is effectively a Verkada-side argument in this matchup.

Comparing other platforms? Verkada vs Rhombus (the closest cloud-native rival), Verkada vs Ubiquiti (license-free UniFi Protect vs the cloud stack), Verkada vs Avigilon (Alta, Unity, and the Motorola ecosystem), Verkada vs Axis (open architecture vs integrated cloud), Verkada vs Ring (the consumer vs commercial boundary), Verkada vs Flock Safety (vehicle intelligence vs building security). Or start from how Verkada pricing works.

Replacing end-of-sale Meraki gear, or just comparing?

Either way, we'll quote the Verkada side (cameras, doors, alarms, and migration from your existing fleet) and set up a 30-day trial.